admiralWillyWilber

I dont mind improved interface for less micro. I can see where that can still be done. But when some one is proposing less features for less micro. That ruins things. Lets not have less features please, but having an option to automate things, like we already have planet governors is good. Instead of getting rid of features how about fixing the ship list, so when you build from a ship start at the first previous ship instead of starting over. When you double click on a tech tree how about ret

If population growth was by civilization, not planets that would go a long way to help tall empires. If single planets had no population caps. Where lets say if you build, or buy a colony ship then starvation is incorperated based on normal rules. You could incorperate no limit on terriformed tiles is you have only one planet. This would go a long way towards tall. You could make the ai more willing to trade rare resources to single planet planet empires, because they are to sma

The only thing any one is talking about is the bible, so no one has read any books on creationism. So when i suggest both sides i can see no one looked at the science behind, or giving creationism a chance. Not arguing consensus just suggesting that some are well educated, and qualified scientists.

Bump

[quote who="ChungasRevenge" reply="28" id="3692641"] Yes, I thought it was time to end the conversation. [e digicons]:)[/e] Religion is always a difficult subject. The problem is that if you put everything into faith, then that is all you need. You don't need to look for answers, you don't need to test your assumptions or your values. Luckily we have the scientific method that does allow up to hypothesise and to test those theories to see if can get closer to real understandi

[quote who="ChungasRevenge" reply="19" id="3692616"] Don't revel in your ignorance. Get an education. Here is a link to start you on your way http://study.com/academy/lesson/evidence-for-the-big-bang-theory-background-radiation-red-shift-and-expansion.html [/quote]Actually I've looked at both sides, and there are compelling arguments on both sides. Your link doesn't work. The reason it is a theory is that they can't find enough evidence to make it a law.

[quote who="ChungasRevenge" reply="15" id="3692582"] Calling the "big bang theory"merely a theory really shows your lack of understanding of what scientific theory means. You can't just ignore the mountains of evidence that support the "theory" by simply saying I don't believe in it so I will ignore it. [/quote]ok what is the evidense.

I recommend increasing factories from 2 to 4. Asteroid mine whenever possible. Remember you start out with hubs not factories. Also your best hub is a city. Putting deep core mine next to the elevator makes a difference. Put your factories, and other hubs around hubs.

[quote who="Uvah" reply="11" id="3692511"] Who created God? Man did thousands of years ago to explain the world around him. What he did not understand he attributed to a higher power. Everything this side of creation has a beginning. If you look at all the diverse cultures that have arisen over the ages you'll notice that all have done the same thing. Whether they are polytheist or monotheist doesn't matter. What does matter is faith and faith demands respect. Something sorely lacking in

If god created us then he has a right to tell us how to live.

[quote who="Jafo" reply="4" id="3692468"] Quoting admiralWillyWilber, reply 1 If some one removed your link that is wrong. No-one removed a link, however the Op edited his thread for a typo. The link is under the subtitle. [/quote]it doesnt work.

If some one removed your link that is wrong. I also believe god created us. To much of science hints of creation, not evolution. Evolution keeps disproven every time they try to prove it.

Our brain has a cerebral cortex that is only found in elephants. Almost all mammals have hair all over their body. I only found a bald rat. While nurturing is found in mammals. Educating is actually found in birds. Our insides are more pig like. Our hands are actually like marsupals, not primates. When you look at it we dont look like we came from an animal, but we are meshed together from different animals, like we are created, or from reused code.

I grew up with a house phone. YOU MIGHT not believe this but there used to not be micro computers.

Ive used diplomats and spies.

If you change leaders like that then i would have no reason to use them. Please dont lessen starting cash there is,already not enough.

This is about production. The reason production was changed was that some considered it op in the base game. Ironically this complaint was not in 2. Once the wheel was removed everything had the value of base production. What this means is that science and wealth is 300 percent higher. While manufacturing is 300 percent except. When your done building social doesnt count towards military, or military doesnt count towards social if your not sponcering a shipyard. I could remedy t

This is about production. The reason production was changed was that some considered it op in the base game. Ironically this complaint was not in 2. Once the wheel was removed everything had the value of base production. What this means is that science and wealth is 300 percent higher. While manufacturing is 300 percent except. When your done building social doesnt count towards military, or military doesnt count towards social if your not sponcering a shipyard. I could remedy t

Simply put ryzen is a better deal, while the intel is priced 4 times higher is a better processor. It is priced more like a i5 which it beats.

Two things i only think. Ive not had a chance to test this. Intel wins on the high end if you have a graphics card. Amd wins on the low end, because they lower their price of older processors. If you are using integrated graphics intel have not improved since 4000, while amd canabolises ati 100 to 200 dollar graphics cards. Plus the makers of play station processors who use integrated graphics should know integrated graphics. Remember i have not tested this.

I would almost take it one step further, and have resource specefic building where instead of building an example farm you could harvest monosatium if you wanted instead. The ideas sound good. I would still think they need a pass on building for resources it seems like they missed some. Whats smac

Im sorry i cant leave this alone. Maybe in the tech tree buildable, but not easily researched, and slower to build. I would have to think about resources. I agree thulium is not used much second is elurium, but i have noticed that other planetary resources are also not used. I would like to see maps balanced. I liked civilization 3. I like the idea of resources to build stuff.

I usually end up with to many resources anyway. The only one im short on is epitheous pollen. So waiting us not a big issue. Point on colonies though. I play slynn, and always convert my constructor into a shipyard. But when i play krynn, or Yor i build the shipyard first instead if rush buying it. I save the credits for asteroids, mercenaries, and starbase upgrades. In the base production was devided between money, research, and money. Without sliders, and the wheel it is not, now production

I actually would like to see one more expansion like you talked about. Im definately not in the camp of less citizens. Im in the camp of improvements being more important than raw production to the point of about 40n.

Well as far as resources i also noticed not all of them were used to build things.