Rhonin_the_wizard

1) Civilizations that have left the UP should not be allowed to trade, I include here trade by freighters and diplomacy, with those that are still members. I know that when a civ vetoes a vote they leave and cancel all treaties with those still in the UP, but it is very easy to reinstate the treaties. Or at the very least you should incur some diplomatic penalty with members for trading with a non-UP civ. 2) All resolutions should be visible, with the exception of those unlocked by te

At this moment we have Loose Clusters, Tight Clusters and Spiral for galaxy setup. I'd like to see some new ones , for example elliptical or lenticular. I would also like to see some of the <a href="https://www.galciv.wikia.com/wiki/

Select the ship/fleet, go to the destination and hold the CTRL key.

Look in the file ShipClassText. It is found in Steam\steamapps\common\Galactic Civilizations III\data\English\Text

[quote who="charon2112" reply="93" id="3662054"] Quoting neilkaz, reply 92 Tight clusters is my usual galaxy and now that we are thankfully back to 1.80 map sizes was this an official patch, or do you mean the mod? [/quote] <p

Either use Steam Workshop and subscribe to different civilizations, or use Gauntlet's Race Mod .

Now you can have more starbases per planet since the limit distance between starbases has been reduced. They plan to implement an administration system that among other things will limit the number of starbases a civilization can have. But it is not yet implemented. The AI has been improved, but without specifics I don't know if it's in ways you care about. They are more resistant when you try to culture flip their worlds for example.

[quote who="Avatar137" reply="16" id="3661547"] EDIT: Wow, not sure about anyone else but this is the worst patch I've ever experienced since release. The game locks up my computer hard when I load one of my saved games and try to play, also turns off all my monitors while leaving the music playing in the background requiring hitting the reset button on the front of my case... tried it twice with the same results. [/quote] Submit a support ticket. I&#

[quote who="mortili" reply="6" id="3661461"] You do realize that you can just take the next bigger map? [/quote] I'm not bothered much since my favorite map size is Insane. But if someone preferred to play on Gigantic, Immense or Excessive they are out of luck. The difference between Excessive and Insane is staggering. [quote who="Old-Spider" reply="20" id="3660872"] For everyone wondering about the galaxy sizes, they have been reduced in

It was the release of the hotpatch for 1.9.

[quote who="neilkaz" reply="2" id="3661332"] Has anything been done to the other map sizes that were drastically reduced in 1.9? [/quote] No. As I stated elsewhere this change will not solve people's grievances since Insane was the least affected map size.

I found something while looking for a completely different thing. In GalCiv3MapDefs 0.40 8 12 4 0.66</MercenaryBaseBlockingPlacementProx

Thanks for the continued updates. Looking forward to Crusade, perhaps a sneak in the Founder's Vault would be a nice Christmas gift. [quote]This is true, I did make them a bit smaller but I made the number of stars and planets available much much higher. In response, we are going to restore the absolute largest sized galaxy. I just personally don't like the pacing and didn't think others would care if I made the absolute size smaller if I was giving them more planets

Read the new dev diary by Brad.

I haven't found where the spawn rate for the bazzar is kept. But wouldn't another solution be to edit the costs of the mercenaries in EXP1_MercenaryDefs to some extremely high amounts like 90000 credits?

[quote who="Voqar" reply="22" id="3660929"] Sounds good, but... Shouldn't this kind of "low hanging fruit" type of optimization have been done during development, like ages ago? I know Frogboy is the man and all but I'd hope they had a few people working on the game that had some clue about writing code and writing reasonably efficient code! [/quote] Perhaps you would like to read what Brad has stated, he didn't optimize the code. [q

[quote who="Seilore" reply="2" id="3660818"] On a different note, I don't see anything on this patch related to galaxy sizes? Does this mean that did not end up getting put into the update? If that's the case thank you. [/quote] Second line under balance. Reduced the size of maps while keeping the same number of objects, effectively increasing the galactic density.

1. You know I just realized it feels a bit strange being able to access the bazaar before researching Universal Translator. 2. Even if all manufacturing is set to social a shipyard will still receive 1 manufacturing point if the sponsor planet has distance decay.

A Thalan trade ship arrived at one of my colonies before I even met them. I also don't think any of their ships saw my planet. A pirate ship that followed one of my constructors attacked the starbase it created. It failed, but I don't recall seeing them do that. It was interesting.

Started a new game to see what changes the update to the opt-in added. Research speed seems better now, but I have few planets due to playing with rare planet setting. I will see how it goes.

It is working, it just isn't displaying that the improvement is finished. Exit the colony and you should the improvement as rushed.

[quote who="Waragh" reply="14" id="3659543"] The alien trait coloniser doesn't work. i don't get a free building when i colinised a planet. [/quote] Weird, it works for me. Reached turn 160. I feel that research is going too fast, especially considering that I have so few research buildings. I haven't met any major civilizations, only two minors. They seem more talkative, I received a number of trade offers from them. Though I

No problems starting on my end. First thought is that load times and turns are much faster even on my old machine. Also I noticed the X for notifications in no longer working.

Under a post there is a triangle with an exclamation mark. Use that to report posts.

[quote who="Seilore" reply="5" id="3656405"] I see there is an update for future DLC's on Steam. Why is this not being updated on the game's own forum? Instead saying we can't talk about anything? With that being said that is still several months old so is that even in line w/ current plans? http://steamcommunity.com/app/226860/discussions/1/492378806373636365/ <br