lyssailcor

lyssailcor

Joined Member # 926429
83 Posts 704 Replies 966 Reputation

[quote who="DST1348" reply="12" id="3717206"] Quoting lyssailcor, reply 11 Ok, today I could play and found the planet that I got through Brindle's. The problem was indeed that I didn't remember that the planet is already colonized. Thanks all for your comments [e digicons];)[/e] I was surpr

13 Replies 68,954 Views

[quote who="MiniV" reply="2" id="3717161"] Quoting lyssailcor, reply 1 DId you do something with your 10 legions you get when researching Planetary Invasion? Because you cannot build transports if you have no legions in the global pool. I didn't do anything with the legions, after I quit the g

4 Replies 22,205 Views

[quote who="shayvaan" reply="6" id="3717117"] Quoting lyssailcor, reply 5 I got Brindle's Observatory quite late in the game, all planets (even extreme ones) that I can see are already colonized. So it should be no problem to see a new, uncolonized planet ... The Brindle Planet is not uncoloni

13 Replies 68,954 Views

DId you do something with your 10 legions you get when researching Planetary Invasion? Because you cannot build transports if you have no legions in the global pool.

4 Replies 22,205 Views

[quote who="Cablenexus" reply="11" id="3716798"] Thank you lyssailcor, you probably have the needed 16 GB in your system to play large maps. Thats nice for you. I understand you will be personally influenced if they remove the gameplay CAP for people without enough RAM and no possibility to upgrade this anytime soon. I don't know exactly what you loose IF the options to play on a large map aren't greyed out anymore for other people? Please explain this to me. [/quote]

25 Replies 180,447 Views

I go there to see the recently active posts: https://forums.galciv3.com/forum/1058 The 3.03 post is not there.

9 Replies 9,929 Views

If you hurt Stardock financially by removing good reviews then you decrease the probability that your complaints are heard because SD won't / can't allocate as much resources to the game. Apart from that it's very subjective what a player sees as fun crippling and what not. SD cannot satisfy all wishes.

25 Replies 180,447 Views

[quote who="Island Dog" reply="3" id="3716727"] V3.03 post is here: https://forums.galciv3.com/489200/galactic-civilizations-iii-v303 [/quote] Yes, I got that, thanks ;) But is it intended then that pinned posts of other subforums don't show up under "Recently Active Posts"?

9 Replies 9,929 Views

Hm, ok, that means pinned posts of other subforums are not shown in the main forum overview page ("Recently Active Posts") ... ? Because I don't see the post there anymore.

9 Replies 9,929 Views

In my current 3.03 opt-in game the Peacekeepers just attacked me although I'm not at war with anyone ... ? Btw, where did the 3.03 thread go?

9 Replies 9,929 Views

[quote who="Nilfiry" reply="81" id="3716572"] Quoting leiavoia, reply 80 I've been able to build two or three import/export centers. I usually notice this after i capture a planet that already has one, usually a civ capital. This is not the case with just Import/Export Centers. &nbs

91 Replies 422,081 Views

[quote who="Derek Paxton" reply="74" id="3716471"] Quoting Croc411, reply 71 This happens all the time, also with other player wonders like Computer Core and Central Bank. So far I was unable to determine a pattern, but it could possibly have to do with loading a savegame. If would be fine if it only happened af

91 Replies 422,081 Views

Something else: in my current game the last few trade offers I got were from weaker civs with good relations, and all where of the kind "I pay you 175 bc + perhaps a tiny bit on top (like an exploration treaty) and you give me all your techs and resources". There must be something off in the trade logic when certain conditions (that I not know ) are met ...

91 Replies 422,081 Views

[quote who="Publius of NV" reply="67" id="3716329"] Quoting Horemvore, reply 64 Treaties are one way. There is no modifier for Giver defined for any of them (they have Reciever only), "TwoWay" to my knowledge, does nothing, never has since I started playing this game 2 years or more ago. (Or is does something other than ma

91 Replies 422,081 Views

Did you start a new game after changing the XMLs? The Mod location for Intrigue is still "C:\Users\ \Documents\My Games\GC3Crusade\Mods". I accidentally left my old Crusade mods there and they worked under Intrigue ;)

10 Replies 12,546 Views

[quote who="Horemvore" reply="64" id="3716291"] Treaties are one way. There is no modifier for Giver defined for any of them (they have Reciever only), "TwoWay" to my knowledge, does nothing, never has since I started playing this game 2 years or more ago. (Or is does something other than makes treaties "Two Way") [/quote] I just established a Research Treaty with the Altarians and can confirm that nothing has changed. Although the tooltip in Treaty Detail states "Give a 25%

91 Replies 422,081 Views

[quote who="Publius of NV" reply="61" id="3716222"] Quoting lyssailcor, reply 60 Are treaties like Research Treaty still one-way? Exploration treaty is not, but as I recall it also wasn't before Intrigue. TreatyDefs.xml for those types (but not exploration) has a line: <div cl

91 Replies 422,081 Views

Playing the 3.03 opt-in as the Terran Resistance I can build the Import Export Center twice. With other civs that happens with other player unique buildings also.

91 Replies 422,081 Views

As I understand it all five points from Brad's post will be implemented, and he asks for more things that we would like to see. Two points I would love: - Let ship weapons fire individually (would have a large impact on ship battles and require a lot more thought on how to build ships since the formula "the bigger the stronger" would not work any longer). - More mystery: more variety in anomalies, more special anomalies that are very rare, more sophisticated story snip

5 Replies 12,741 Views