Skillet (the band, that is :))
Electo
I realize that dreams just don't suit themselves to XP (and you just put forth a lot of effort to make it for all Vista users :)), but will we ever be able to expect a DeskScapes for XP? I browse and watch some of the great dreams on the site, but I can't actually use any of them. :NOTSURE: And I'm not willing to upgrade to Vista. ;)
I realize this post is sort of old, but I think I found a work-around for changing Z-Order. As long as your widget or group is has movement locked, then this should work well (you could probably even do it with a movable object with a little more script). You have two/three base objects with a transparent 1x1 image (not no image at all, as this seems to make everything act weird on Always on Top), each object with a different Z-Order setting through the DX GUI editor. When you want to c
I actually looked at shell32.dll in Resource Hacker, and the folder icons are listed under "Icons" and they are numbers 16 - 37. Each icon size/format has a different icon number. You probably actually want the icons 23-26, though (they are 32-bit closed folders)
The script actually seems a bit flaky... I get an error message for about every other file I try to add to my list. Maybe it's just the way that I'm implementing the script. And it also doesn't check the format of .EXE files because I tried to import the .EXE I made in assembly (does not have PE headers and such) and it throws an error about reaching the end of the file (it's an extremely simple program). Unless I'm able to solve all these bugs before I get bored of it (I give up easily
Wow... I'm really stupid :P. I didn't realize that the actual icon extraction occurred in its own function. Thanks, SirSmiley. I appreciate your time. I probably would have just thrown away the icon extraction idea. I should be able to incorporate it into my own theme now.
Uh oh... is this going to turn that April Fool's joke into a reality? Well, I do use Linux on rare occasions. I recently took a long time to install and set up a dual-boot system, but now my Linux hard disk is basically just collecting dust... but I voted Linux since I do use it a little bit (though I'm still not able to vote on polls for some reason, which I made a forum post about but didn't get fixed...).
[quote]The work-a-round I use is to clone text objects and position them relative to the icon.[/quote] Does this mean that you somehow got rid of the icon label through script? If I could know how to do that, I'd be able to figure it out from there. I've already written a script to arrange [I]text[/I] shortcuts, but I want to retain the shortcut's icon as well.
Thanks, SirSmiley. You can find the script at the website that I wrote in the original post: [link="http://gilpin.us/IconSiphon/"]http://gilpin.us/IconSiphon/[/link] [quote]not to mention that that DesktopX has it's own callback "Sub Object_OnDropFiles (files)".[/quote] I realize that, but it doesn't work very well using that by itself. If you want to move the object so it is aligned with other icons inside the background, the label doesn't even move with it.
For ObjectDock (OD): If you have downloaded an OD background, open the downloaded file in a ZIP manager application, since most OD backgrounds are in ZIP format. Installing ObjectDock creates a folder called "Stardock" in My Documents. Open that, and inside there should be another folder, "ObjectDock Library," and then "Backgrounds" Just extract the ZIP contents into the "Backgrounds" folder. You should be able to select that background now when you open up the Appearance tab in OD conf
ANY text editor can open ANY file. A "file" is simply a bunch of 1's and 0's, no matter what format it is. So a text editor will look at the arrangement of 1's and 0's and interpret them as characters, which you see on your screen (letters, numbers, symbols, etc.). It's just the concept of a text editor that makes it "corrupt." And anyway, a hacker would attack the files directly by changing those 1's and 0's with their own program, not through Notepad. It's just the nature of a text ed
I am not all that experienced with VBScript, so sorry if this is a dumb question. I have a DX script that accesses the WScript COM object directly (if "directly" is the right word) instead of through the CreateObject function. When I try to run the script, DesktopX gives me the error, "Object required: wscript". Here's an example of what I'm doing: If wscript.arguments.count=0 Then msgbox "Drop files on me to extract the icons." I've seen other users use WScript like that (w
I'm sorry, I didn't notice that somebody else already posted something about the same topic ("Office 2007" by coult69). However, it would be nice if somebody had any advice about the non-theme aware programs problem. They still have the old "Windows Classic Style" look.
Looking back through older skins in the WindowBlinds gallery, I was looking at the Aero Executive preview picture and I noticed at the bottom that the borders in Microsoft Word 2007 were skinned. I posted a comment on the skin about this a while ago, but I didn't think anybody would notice it since it's a relatively old skin. Anyway, I was just wondering how the authors of Aero Executive went about getting Office 2007 to skin in the preview. Or is it supposed to be skinned by default,
My problem still hasn't been fixed yet... I just tried to vote on the most recent poll, "Changing Skins," but it didn't work. Maybe the Total Votes number on the webpage only refreshes on an interval? Still, after voting I don't get a page confirming that my vote was successfully submitted like I would expect from a poll, which makes me wonder if it is working or not. If anyone could help, it would be appreciated.
Great jokes! Too bad I didn't check the site yesterday, so I saw the big "April Fools 2008! :D" on all the articles before I read them... :) But really, you can't *port* Object Desktop to Mac and Linux - they're completely different operating systems! Stardock would have to rebuild all their software from the ground up and support each OS separately, as far as I know. That would be quite a burden on Stardock, since they've already got a lot on their hands with a single OS already. Anyways.
Oh, thanks Bebi Bulma. In that case, I have no extra toolbars other than the navigation and bookmarks toolbars for Firefox, which is the browser I always use. My addons are: DOM Inspector, Mouse Gestures, Skype extension, and YoYo Games InstantPlay. (Skype extension installs automatically with Skype and the YoYo Games extension is at yoyogames.com... ;p. Just in case you need to test them out yourself). If it would be relevant, I use the default Firefox skin. Hopefully that's
Sorry, here's my information: 1. Firefox, Version 2.0.0.12 2. Windows XP Professional, SP2 3. Toolbars: Only Windows taskbar, system tray. Addons: All Stardock customization software for XP except ObjectDock, ObjectBar, Virtual Desktops, WindowFX, and Keyboard Launchpad. Latest stable versions for all, except DesktopX 3.49f[rc].017 (beta might be unstable). 4. Norton AntiVirus 2007 5. Yes, I allow Firefox to run JavaScript. I'm not sure if I understand what you
I already posted a reply to the Standard Vs. Widescreen poll about this problem, and somebody else seemed to have the same problem, but I thought it wouldn't get much attention unless I brought it here. So, my problem is that I can't vote on any polls here on WinCustomize. I tried before on the Desktop Vs. Laptop poll, and I just tried on the Standard Vs. Widescreen poll, but it doesn't seem to work (after I cast my vote, the "Total Votes" doesn't increase). I was wondering if I needed to
[quote]I couldn't vote on this[/quote] Yes - in fact, I forgot to mention that I haven't been able to vote on any other polls. I tried to vote on the Desktop vs. Laptop poll, but I had the same problem as I said above.
I use a standard monitor, 1280x1024. I tried to vote, but nothing seemed to happen (the total votes did not go up). Do I need to subscribe to WinCustomize in order to participate in polls?
Thank you, Neil. The pink borders are no longer a problem. I don't use the task switching feature for the mouse, but will I lose any other features as a result of keeping ipoint.exe from running? [quote]Issue 3 is normal. It is basically a side effect of how start menu transparency works on XP.[/quote] So it's not possible to do true per-pixel alpha on XP because of restrictions in the OS?
[quote]lol.. u posted an image.. a screenshot.. that is hosted on your site.. hello !! [/quote] Heh. I was pretty dense there. :) Back on topic... I also just noticed that Problem 1 also happens to push buttons, and it's even more noticeable. It probably happens with any control that has a glow effect.
[quote]My point is.. have you turned of all modifications, recoloring, blur, trans, gamma etc etc?[/quote] Yes, I have. [quote]Because I clicked on your image to see it [/quote] I thought I never got to putting it on my profile... and when I go to look at it, it's nowhere on there.