[quote who="BuckGodot" reply="37" id="3632477"] Quoting Zhen724, reply 36 Plese don't forget we are speaking about an OPTION of removing stacking bonuses. This still doesn't address my point about overloading a game with options. GC III is already rather (in)famous when it comes to opt
[quote who="BuckGodot" reply="34" id="3632431"] Quoting Zhen724, reply 31 Please speak for yourself. You didn't conduct an opinion poll to know who is in majority and who in minority. . No, but I have been around the GC community (mostly lurking) for at least eight years.
[quote who="BuckGodot" reply="27" id="3632296"] Quoting Zhen724, reply 26 Ok you like bonus stacking and I don't. Why not make a game option removing bonus stacking so that both of us could enjoy the game? Not to speak for Paul, but because balancing becomes a huge issue. If (the attempt a
Ok you like bonus stacking and I don't. Why not make a game option removing bonus stacking so that both of us could enjoy the game?
"Depending on feedback, we may end up increasing the maintenance cost, increasing the min distance between starbases, or even reducing some of the bonuses. The one thing that I don't want to do is remove the bonus stacking, so let me know what you think of the new system, and what horrible exploits you find." I dislike every word of this. Just remove the