Frogboy, That's Princess Adora... or better know as She'Ra! He'Man's twin sister. "For the honor of Greyskull!" Ironically, I happen to be watching the cartoon while reading this post. Good times.
I'd rather you guys have a heart to heart talk with your fan base and find out which version people would want to support. I have no intention of ever, ever playing Gal Civ III: Base now that Crusade exists. I'd rather you focused all of engineering, art, and others allocated to Crusade and continue with that version. I feel like this is the same conversation that Singularity had and Escalation ended up being the version people wanted overall. Crusade is a better version from my point of view
I stopped playing recently until some of the more annoying bugs are sorted out but that doesn't mean I don't plan to play in the future. I know for certain that I want no part in playing original Gal Civ compared to Crusade. Crusade is far and above better than Gal Civ original. Just like with Ashes, I don't see any point in supporting the original at this point. It seems like a waste of resources. My problem with Crusade falls into a couple of things: 1. Bugs. I
Now don't get me wrong. Maybe the AI just happens to have a bunch of different planets with 200+ research but I really doubt it. Those kind of bonuses are really hard to get especially galazy wide. Anyway, no idea what to do because it broke my game and I don't want to play it anymore. I've posted the save file though. I'm the Smith empire and the Terran's are absurdly doing too well. Here's the file in my Dropbox: <
Since you gave us founders access to Crusade, I thought a bug report thread might help. I know there was another one but please only post bugs in here. - Was making race and setting traits. The tooltip for handy for the blue circle says it's -30% while the green circle says it's +20%. This is obviously wrong. - In creating custom race abilities screen, vigilant a
Brad, I appreciate the update on this. You didn't have to and I appreciate it anyway. P.S. Was making race and setting traits. The tooltip for handy for the blue circle says it's -30% while the green circle says it's +20%. This is obviously wrong.
A couple of alternate suggestions for how the game could end differently: None of these I expect at launch. 1. Tyrant at least, or maybe any sovereign who chooses evil options, has the option of co-opting the doom counter and actually "wins" the game by becoming the big bad and ending life instead of the SK. What could be interesting about this path is that you'd have to learn how to cast the spell. The spell might be researched like the spaceship from the Civ games where
I have an older athelon quadcore and 4gb and the game plays quite poorly for me. It used to be worse in previous betas though. Now I have terrible tracking issues and it slogs between turns. I've given up playing it until I get a better computer.
I played since Alpha and influence was majorly broken up until about three weeks ago. Even then, I was able to make significant progress with cultural victory but nothing insane. It's not so much the 10% but if you compound that with a cultural space station then your output can be strong enough with your homeworld to take over a small map. It wasn't difficult a month ago and still not impossible two weeks ago. Besides you're right when you say that +2 is strong because it
Thanks Seilore, I'll do the above when I have a chance. Thanks though. I do want to make GalCiv III the best it can be if I can.
I was wondering if anyone else is having trouble playing the game. I know it's beta but I feel like beta 2 played better than this. I can't even play beta 4 without throwing up my hands in frustration because of the lag that occurs every turn anytime I have to change screens, or change to another ship. I turned off anti-aliasing and bloom and that didn't help Anyway other suggestions?
Just wanted to ask if were will have closed borders as a default setting or will it be a technology we can research. Is closed borders even possible. I've never liked the AI wandering into my territory. It should work like Civ 4-5
I still don't much care for the tech tree as currently implemented but that's because it feels tedious to keep selecting tech. The original poster's feeling is shared by me. I'd rather have less of those enhancement tech that give 10% or 20% of something. At least though, I'd rather have those tech be completely optional. 10% can matter quite a bit I've never liked researching those techs. It feels boring. It makes the tech tree feel huge and I simply stopped having fu
The only question I care about is whether we can have a diplomatic option to have closed borders. I hated in GalCiv II where the Ai would just come into my territory and colonize an area that they could only get to through my territory. It's the same in GalCiv. I'd like to see closed borders option. Thanks.
When I have more time, I'll comment on other things. First and foremost on my mind from my play last night was how unfortunate it was that the same hex grid, as exactly implemented from GCII, was back. Now, I don't really mind how it was implemented in GCII because the buildings didn't interact with each other in any meaningful way. I was always sure to build the right building with a bonus in GCII. In alpha-GCIII, I didn't build this way because the con
I had something similar to this but I was able to recreate it when I was almost to the end of the defense research tree. It happened every single time when I was researching Electronic Magnetic Defense. (it was pretty far down the tree if I recall) The game wouldn't crash but it would simply stop working. I have the autosave if you guys are interested in it.
I can also confirm that because "Done" was listed on the left then I thought I saved when in reality I did not. Save should be on the left. Many cultures always read from left to right first so it's the best place for it. Also, not sure what's the purpose of done anyway. Probably just good enough to have "Save" and "Cancel" and nothing else