arunodayt

First off, I would like to thank Stardock for adopting regional pricing for India, which Steam introduced very recently. So, instead of waiting for the game to go on sale for 50-60% off, I finally bought it for full price and don't have to wait more to play it [e digicons]:D[/e] From past experience, I am sure GalCiv 3 will be as good a game for its time as GalCiv 2 was. And the good thing is - now I can get the expansion on Day 1 instead of waiting for a sale, tha

Yes, that is also good, but on larger maps or with too many planets I don't prefer to micromanage that much. When I have nothing better to do other than cranking out constructors, I go for high research/social spending.

GalCiv2, and when I have access to a decent PC, Civ5.

[quote who="Tyrantissar" reply="210" id="3413497"] This topic is so hot they cannot ignore it, and I say please provide a non steam version, otherwise you will piss off so many people. Also I say yes to steam, because I have a steam account and everything for it.[/quote] That is what some people said about Civ5 when it was announced that it will use Steamworks. I was one of the people who said that I probably won't buy the game bec

Stardock can go with the option that Paradox Interactive uses for its Steam games- require internet connection (and Steam) for first time activation and then Steam is not required except to update the game. There is a possibility that Stardock already does this, in which case almost no one should have any problems with Steam :)

Earlier, it was - what happens if my internet goes down for a long time. Nowadays, however, with mobile internet, it is no longer the case. While I can't download a game with it, I can get the game working again if the offline mode stops working. Now, two things: 1. Lazy developers - are 10GB patches ever justified if there is no new content? This has become a problem for some of my friends who are unable to buy some Steamworks games, even on DVD, because th