[quote who="Vaelzad" reply="108" id="3593292"] On a side note it's great to see EVERYONE's enthusiasm for the game. Here are a few answers for some of the topics that have been brought up. 1) Alternate timeline The exact story related modification we are going to be doing hasn't been publicly revealed, it is something we are saving for the Founders. As a result I'm not going to be confirming o
All of them? :) I hope you guys continue the streams\youtube with future expansion and content.
Map size. I heard on a previous stream about the number of tiles the maps have in comparison to galvic2. What I haven't heard or been able to find is how many planets are possible?
Very nice. You guys should do this in one of your Friday videos.
For me Moo2 and GalCiv are the classic 4x games. I always thought Moo2 did combat better and GalcCiv did everything outside of combat better. I've always wanted a game that had the best of both. So for all those against tactical combat. Did you not like Moo2? I think most people will agree that once you got huge fleets full of dreadnaughts it was a pain, but I still enjoyed most of the battles. With the logistics in galciv and todays tech you wouldn't have those huge fleet battles tha
I like options myself. I would always start games with the combat viewer at 1x and watch the battle, then speed up, speed up some more, then quick battles. I would love it if there was an option added to have more direct control like Moo2...hopefully one that didn't take hours to complete :)
That was my guess. Thanks for the response!
First I'm very happy to hear the news about galciv3! Can't wait. When it comes to my strategy games I am almost exclusively single player. There was a post I agreed with back in 2006, by Frogboy, talking about multiplayer and galciv. https://forums.galciv2.com/98074/page/25 Has the tech changed enough that multiplayer doesn't take as many resources as in the past to implement?