inc0gnito

inc0gnito

Joined Member # 3682642
0 Posts 0 Replies 5 Reputation

[quote who="angus1949" reply="50" id="2494424"]Let's just face it. The OP was an ass in the rude way he approached his inquiry. I also know that the Stardock staff are working on a multitude of projects and they will get done when they are done. No amount of beating the dead horse here will change things. Maybe more support and encouragement instead of negativity would serve us better all the way around. IMHO threads like this should be ignored from the star

83 Replies 165,450 Views

[quote who="RedneckDude" reply="46" id="2494349"] I didn't intend for you to be employed by Stardock, just be a good community member and share your skills to help the community, like littleboy and people like him. You have the skill, this should be about the betterment of the community, if you are a member, rather than being about you, or you having a gripe with Stardock. I would gladly help if I had the skill. Believe me, DesktopX is in much worse shape than OD.[/quote] I would

83 Replies 165,450 Views

[quote who="RedneckDude" reply="43" id="2494333"] Then jump in there and help fix it, instead of complaining. [/quote] Unfortunately my employment contract with my current company precludes me from being employed by any other company for the duration of the contract. Besides, Stardock got itself into this mess, it's up to them to dig themselves out of it.

83 Replies 165,450 Views

[quote who="JcRabbit" reply="36" id="2494177"]Sorry guys, while I totally understand your frustration, as a software developer myself I have to side with Stardock on this one. When you purchase an application, you should only do it for what it does for you *now*, not for whatever expectations you have about it in the future (unless, of course, the developer stated that x or y features will be coming soon). [/quote]JcRabbit, I am a fellow software developer, so hopef

83 Replies 165,450 Views

[quote who="starkers" reply="33" id="2494117"]Seriously, though, asking for a refund on an app that was largely written for (and still works well) on XP, just because it has issues on a more recent OS, is not warranted. It'd be like sliding off the road in wet weather, then suing the tyre company becase you chose to put on dry-weather slicks.[/quote] What OS it was "developed for" is irrelevant. See the boxed (in red) areas below <img src="http://i45.tinypic.com/23rmu5e.png" alt

83 Replies 165,450 Views

[quote who="messiah1" reply="15" id="2493654"] What I have a problem with is people always calling the Developer(s) out on this same, tired issue. Incognito, it seems, lurks in the corner just waiting for someone to put a thread in the OD category so he can spout the same old song and dance he's been spouting for soooooo long. I'm sure I'm not the only one tired of hearing his trivial banter, but I'm one of the few who will say something about it. Dude, we u

83 Replies 165,450 Views

[quote who="Neil Banfield" reply="6" id="2493422"] It is important to remember that when you purchase a product you purchase it as it is now, not as it might be in 6 - 9 months time. [/quote] While I agree that when one purchases a product, one does so on its present rather than future merits, but future merits may (and very often do) come into consideration. This is particularly applicable to ObjectDock, because its product page states that it is in constant developmen

83 Replies 165,450 Views

[quote who="c242" reply="1" id="2493372"]I am as keen as Your are on 2.0, but to keep it fair : There is no right in a refund, as we all purchased 1.x. You won't ask for a refund on Windows XP because Microsoft was late on Vista, right ?[/quote]Unfortunately, that is indeed the state of affairs. Short of writing on the forum and sending an e-mail to support, there's little pressure that a customer can put on Stardock to "get a move on" with OD+. There does not seem to be much of an ince

83 Replies 165,450 Views

[quote who="Mirsguy" reply="83" id="2482998"] Now I agree with you. Now if I can extend a handshake, so to speak, maybe we can end this as gentlemen.[/quote] Sure, let's shake hands. You saying that you have no problems rubbed salt into my wound of using OD+, so that's why I took it close to heart [e digicons]:'([/e]

107 Replies 287,720 Views

[quote who="Hankers" reply="80" id="2482955"]This post is starting to stray a bit and getting personal. As it is in the 'Support' section it is meant to request help from Stardock support. Members are encouraged to offer help if they so chose and this is encouraged. What isn't encouraged is any personal attacks and from some of the responses it is nearing that. Please refrain from such activity. Thank you[/quote] Apologies if I descended to such a leve

107 Replies 287,720 Views

[quote who="wc2005" reply="76" id="2482867"]...but i think if they do not show the users some improvements or new things for it, ObjectDock will be forgiven sooner or later...[/quote]Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe you meant to say "forgotten" and not "forgiven", right?

107 Replies 287,720 Views

[quote who="Mirsguy" reply="75" id="2482866"] My menus don't hide behind other things, etc... [/quote] I'm not talking about your menus. I am talking about a specific context menu for that particular program that is installed on my system. Don't compare your menus to my menus if they are not the same. [quote who="Mirsguy" reply="75" id="2482866"] And messenger? That would be an issue with, you guessed it; MESSENGER! [/quote] Errr, wrong. The way Tas

107 Replies 287,720 Views

Hold on a moment, Mirsguy stated on the very first page of this thread that he could not reproduce any of the problems mentioned in the Bugs' thread. He got called out for that. Turns out that he didn't reproduce the behaviour, he just said what his experience with Windows 7 + OD is. Fair enough, I respect that. However, people who aren't willing to go to the lengths of attempting to reproduce bugs or tinker with their configurations shouldn't get involved in threads to do with bugs.

107 Replies 287,720 Views

[quote who="Jafo" reply="63" id="2482140"] If others have not experienced any issues with 'their' use of a proggy [from wherever, not just Stardock's software] then it just MIGHT point to the problem being 'local' and not user-wide/endemic with the software. [/quote] Herein lies a problem, Jafo. 'Their' use is not the same as 'my' use and they are not willing to step into 'my shoes'. Therefore, one cannot compare those two. For example, if I have a problem with a particular

107 Replies 287,720 Views

[quote who="Wizard1956" reply="61" id="2482100"] I see nothing in OD's documentation or system requirements that says it will be compatable far into the future on any OS. [/quote] OD product page does say: "In constant development, ObjectDock and ObjectDock Plus are enhanced often to provide the most unique features of any stylized shortcut organizer / launcher available." Stemming from that statement, I do not think that it is unreasonable for OD to be compatibl

107 Replies 287,720 Views

[quote who="RedneckDude" reply="58" id="2482002"] Dude, I have very few problems with ANY of Stardock's programs. Saying that does not constitute heckling. Mirsguys is here because he is a very talented artist, and he is happy to create and share. He is here, as are most of us, to enjoy each other, and each other's work. We like to try to help when we can, but it is not our job, or our reason for being here, to cater to what you think our job is. I have stayed silen

107 Replies 287,720 Views

[quote who="Jafo" reply="55" id="2481904"] All sorts of reasons....possibly the last of which is to attempt to 'break' a program prior to which he has struck no problem/s. People are here to interact as they see fit...some tend to be here only to complain, others are here only to enjoy. Their choice, really....[/quote] I can understand that a person may be reluctant to 'break' a program. However, I also don't think it's fair for a person to come out and say

107 Replies 287,720 Views

[quote who="Vampothika" reply="53" id="2481847"]its NOT HIS JOB as many of us have said, send an email to stardock....[/quote]I didn't say or imply that it is. So what's the point of a forum then? A forum is meant for discussion of matters relating to a forum's subject. It's a place where we can exchange information and share experiences. It's a place where a community of users can foster and collaborate together. If a user is unwilling to help another user with a particular matter related to

107 Replies 287,720 Views

[quote who="starkers" reply="51" id="2481679"] Why on Earth would Mirsguy even want to reproduce a bug on his system? The end result would create issues... issues he does NOT need (or proof of) on his machine. The person with whom this (reproduction issue) should be addressed is the developer. Put another way, if someone asked to to reproduce a dose of the clap, would you want to create an undesirable effect??[/quote] Do you even know how bug reporting

107 Replies 287,720 Views

[quote who="Vampothika" reply="48" id="2481393"] wtf does mirsguy have to do with object dock bugs?? lol hes just a skinner, not the creator of the program...you should be sending an email to stardock support if you have issues. and or check yr pc.[/quote]I was simply asking him to check if he can reproduce the bugs that I have been encountering. Whether he's a skinner or the creator of the program doesn't make a difference as far as whether one can reproduce a bug or not.

107 Replies 287,720 Views

MarkLederer, that's a conundrum though. It's a "hit and miss" type of situation. Some people report it working, some are having serious issues. The official line is that Stardock haven't released a version that is fully compatible, hence it's not supported. However, I do agree with OP's statements.

2 Replies 1,412 Views

Yes, support cases have been filed for some of them. Some I was told were known bugs to them. Some I was told were added to list of issues that would be looked that. No updated builds have been released to incorporate those bug fixes. You're free to make your own conclusions. As for whether the bugs that I mentioned are problems with the actual program, I think that they are. The hibernation issue certainly is, incorrect display of context meny from systray is, Skype focus error is, n

107 Replies 287,720 Views

[quote who="Shelbygt_the_Car~!" reply="40" id="2466318"] inc0gnito, can you give us the info about this bug here again... seems I missed that or other? [/quote] It's more than just one. Look at all the bug reports that have been posted here: https://forums.stardock.com/357439

107 Replies 287,720 Views