Looking good guys :D Birger :)
MindTooth
I would leave Opera any day, but not for Internet Explorer. Firefox FTW! Birger :)
What is the current release of IconPackager. I can remember that 168 were the latest when I last checked. Birger :)
If so is the case, they need to fix the removed by Impulse. The problem is related to a laptop I borrowed from work. And I really need to fix this. Birger :)
Installing IconPackager through Impulse all the times. Removed it both with Impulse and the standard solution from Windows. Birger :)
I haven't got any reply for aprox. three weeks... Poor by Stardock! Birger :)
DirectX 11 is planned for both Windows Vista and Windows Vienna. Not sure which who will get the support first. Birger :)
The DirectX 10.1 version of Assassin's Creed performed well. But Ubisoft claimed that is was "unstable". However, I have my reasons to believe that NVIDIA was the one that asked them to remove it. Since it ran well on ATI cards, and not cards from NVIDIA do to the lack of DirectX 10.1. Birger :)
And what do you consider HUGE? If I were hiding, I would have heard of a HUGE update. But no... Birger :)
My current experience is also telling me that IconPackager is broken, and Stardock should really collect all the data from the users, this to solve as much problems as possible. It has been a while since IconPackager received a large update, and it is due time. Birger :)
Does any game from Stardock support DirectX 10? Great that Microsoft develop DirectX. To bad that there is just a few developers that utilize the library. Birger :)
@Ruben: May I suggest that you remove IconPackager, run CCleaner afterwards, and re-install with Impulse. Birger :)
How is the progress? Birger :)
Still an issue. Birger :)
I were just told that this is the state IconPackager leaves Vista users when they decide to uninstall IconPackager. I replied the email to support, and urged them to remove the software since it is broken. Poor by Stardock! Just extreme poor!!! Birger :(
Hail Brad! This is really an admirable point of view. What Brad is saying, is like words from some higher power. I urge Stardock and other companies to just ignore people that have a mission to just make BS. What Stardock is doing, is IMHO the best way to do things. CEO that talks with the people and love what he does so he cares less what other thinks, that is the way! So all respect to Stardock, and please leave all other whiners... Birger :)
To solve this problem, I would suggest a ImpulseTray with a right click to "Friends", "Servers", "Games", etc. And when you click either and Impulse isn't loaded, you only get a small window down right just above the tray containing the relevant data. Frogboy? Birger :)
If you leave Stardock because of the way they are distributing their patches, then you are better off. Since I would rather have Impulse and receive a patch after two, three years, rather then not getting anything at all. Take a look at Steam. Do you really think that Valve would update Half-Life if they did not have Steam? No they would not, since the work applying stand-alone patches is much harder then just have a unified platform like Impulse or Steam. Birger :)
Nope. WindowBlinds is named WindowBlinds only. If they fucked up because the renamed the app, they are bad at their work. Regardless the reason, no need for the app name to contain a version number. Birger :)
Yeah, it is a bad practice. Since the name of the app is still IconPackager, Windows Media Player, Microsoft Office, etc. Since every other app in My Desktop is named without the version number, IconPackager doesn't need it then. Birger :)
IMHO, there is alot of dumb people out there. Just because your computer are slow, you run IE6, Windows 2000, without internet. Really, who cares? I certainly does not! Because that the progress would never improve since you always must think about backward compatibility. And that is just silly, since a product should always improve to the better and stable, not just the last. I then urge Stardock to rewrite the about page about Sins, and state clearly that Impulse is needed, Windows XP
Please remove "IconPackager 4" and replace it with just "IconPackager". Birger :)
[quote]have you set IP to the default icons, then rebuilt the cache, repair icon images, and repair shell icons from the IP settings tab before uninstalling?[/quote] Several times, but still no go. Birger :)
Been there, done that. Nothing helps at this moment. Seems like a bug that occur only to a few, like me :( Thanks for the suggestion though :D Birger :)
My icons still break after I have uninstalled IconPackager. It is okay that you want the users to install your apps, but when they choose to remove it, don't leave the system malfunction. Birger :)