Even if the inconsistencies were intentional, I really want to know the thoughts behind why they were set that way. To me, it makes no sense, and severely skews the outcome of resources that appear. Of course, my money is on that they just screwed up.

Thanx!

Thanks for this post. Ill switch Uncommon Nebula from 0.07 to 0.03. That one definitely didn't get updated.

What is the issue with the others? Are you expecting that jumps would always be linear?

btw: PlanetFrequencyExp of None looks wrong at 1.0. But you can't select None for PlanetFrequencyExp so that value isn't used.

Are you saying that it is odd that the jump from occasional to common nebula is 0.05 while the jump from common to abundant is 0.02?

ie: that the breaks are sequential, but that the gaps aren't always linear?

(btw: im not arguing with you, i appreciate your feedback, im just trying to understand the issue)

The habitable planet settings also. I don't no why and no matter which values are in this sheet. In game you have only with all setting at abundant a couple of habitable planets. All other combination of number of stars, number of planets and number of habitable planets feels in game ever at the same. You have got nearly none habitable planets. 

There is nothing between "very much" and " against zero"... No matter which setting combination. 

This is what I've been playing with and it's working out pretty well. I also found an issue constraining the amount of habitable planets in another file (so no matter how frequent they were here you wouldn't get any more). I tried to take advantage of each setting to give players the most customization possible.

I'll keep playing with it and get these in for 3.03.

Ohhh Yes, very very awesome! Thanks you  

Quoting Derek Paxton,

reply 12

Reduced 69%

Original 1173 x 667

This is what I've been playing with and it's working out pretty well. I also found an issue constraining the amount of habitable planets in another file (so no matter how frequent they were here you wouldn't get any more). I tried to take advantage of each setting to give players the most customization possible.

I'll keep playing with it and get these in for 3.03.

That other file, would it be StarSystemDefs.xml?(If not, what file? Is it accessible to modding?)

There seems to be a limit with StarSystems, no matter how many you set MaxPlanets too it caps out at 3 per system, there are infact random systems in the StarSystemDefs.xml calling for  4 - 6 Planets but they never appear in game due to the cap, they come out as 3 planet systems.

Kudos to you for looking into this. Much appreciated.

Quoting scifi1950,

reply 13

Kael - Once again, your being with Stardock was one of the best decisions Frogboy ever made    

Could not agree more.  

Great! ! The not working galaxy settings were the biggest bug for me! It looks really good and I'm really happy that it will fix after a soooo long time. 

I can't await to test it in my game  

Thanks so much! 

Exactly ! But if abundant works I have a big hope that all other settings also works an to play with it in game will create what you really want!