The third line has some good stuff, but kinda of tails off. The third option is so good that 4 and 5 are kind of meh. In fact, other than the 5th option on the bottom line, all of Benevolent's top-tiers are a bit meh; the table as a whole has a lot of outright weak options, and this tends to get worse the higher up you go - in benevolent games I've often found myself preferring to go for lower-unlocks when given the choice, because in many cases they're more powerful than higher choices. Pragmatic's just as bad, if not worse.
I'd like to see the top-tier ones buffed a lot - make them super-powerful, so that you don't find yourself deciding to pick a T2 trait over a T5 when given the option. Then make ideology harder to get (perhaps scaled by map size) so that you never really get 5/5/5/5 empires. Having only 10 or 12 trait's worth of points would make picking them into a genuine choice, where as presently you can comfortably fill out a tree and a half on the larger maps; it's another example of how the devs never thought that players would want lots of planets per empire (they seem to have assumed that anyone playing on insane would automatically be wanting 100 other small empires, rather than, say, 16 large ones - which was unfortunate when the game only shipped with a few races, so most 'insane' players first experience was the game breaking down horribly in the face of their 80-planet empire).
GalCiv3 Forums
