Any ship parts that y'all really want?

A simply question.I would like something like the curved wings,but covered in smaller curved wings.I would make a "sharp" edition to the parts list.

70,944 views 31 replies
Reply #1 Top

I want a mechanical mouth that swallows enemy ships.

Reply #2 Top

Quoting Gaslov, reply 1

I want a mechanical mouth that swallows enemy ships.
End of Gaslov's quote

Yes, it might be very comical to see your ship literally chewing up an enemy ship, with pieces crumbling to the side and then getting grabbed by the mouth and swallowed, complete with swallowing motions. Yeah, maybe for the first five or ten times. Still, a rather whimsical idea.

Reply #3 Top

Quoting Lucky, reply 2


Quoting Gaslov, reply 1
I want a mechanical mouth that swallows enemy ships.

Yes, it might be very comical to see your ship literally chewing up an enemy ship, with pieces crumbling to the side and then getting grabbed by the mouth and swallowed, complete with swallowing motions. Yeah, maybe for the first five or ten times. Still, a rather whimsical idea.
End of Lucky's quote

That'd be funny to watch.Kind'a reminds me of Unicron.

Reply #4 Top

In GalCiv2, there were never enough "cockpit" or "bridge" looking pieces, in my opinion. More of those would be great.

Reply #5 Top

Hedgehog/Squid alike system, to deliver my beloved mines closer to enemy. Dropping "depth-charge" alike on pursuer also looks nice. :D

 

I wonder how many basic components we would have (or integration with third-party tool, like Blender, to make our own), allowing us to build anything in our game, without any worries about copyrights and licensees - I wouldn't mind to add F-5-alike plane into. :)

Reply #6 Top

Quoting MacModder, reply 4

In GalCiv2, there were never enough "cockpit" or "bridge" looking pieces, in my opinion. More of those would be great.
End of MacModder's quote

More of them would be nice.

Quoting Rudy_102, reply 5

Hedgehog/Squid alike system, to deliver my beloved mines closer to enemy. Dropping "depth-charge" alike on pursuer also looks nice.

 

I wonder how many basic components we would have (or integration with third-party tool, like Blender, to make our own), allowing us to build anything in our game, without any worries about copyrights and licensees - I wouldn't mind to add F-5-alike plane into.
End of Rudy_102's quote

There's the big question.

Reply #7 Top

Quoting SF1, reply 6
There's the big question.
End of SF1's quote

 

Yeah, but since there Steam, it only would be wise to attach steamwork, and either give us tools, or tell which ones we could use. Otherwise, it's better to find those 20 millions for non-steam version. :D

Reply #8 Top

A part that can be animated in sync with a particular ship weapon.

Reply #9 Top

Quoting Replicators, reply 8

A part that can be animated in sync with a particular ship weapon.
End of Replicators's quote
That'd be nice.Like a mass driver barrel that recoils.

Reply #10 Top

Quoting Replicators, reply 8

A part that can be animated in sync with a particular ship weapon.
End of Replicators's quote

Genius. ^THIS guy knows what he's talking about.

Reply #11 Top

I would like a world laser. Something that would essentially take up the entirety of the ship, would have to be built around for looks that would annihilate worlds. It could be a massive research project that would take its own hull, you could then enact your own design for it.

Reply #12 Top

Quoting kalimor, reply 11

I would like a world laser. Something that would essentially take up the entirety of the ship, would have to be built around for looks that would annihilate worlds. It could be a massive research project that would take its own hull, you could then enact your own design for it.
End of kalimor's quote

While I think this idea has appeal, I would like it to carry severe universal diplomatic penalties when someone used it.

Reply #13 Top

Absolutely Lucky Jack. Much like the Death Star was absolutely hated. A world destroyer would have to have major political ramifications. Only really the worst races, or those in utter desperation would resort to it. Which is why it would be AWESOME!

Reply #14 Top

Quoting kalimor, reply 13

Absolutely Lucky Jack. Much like the Death Star was absolutely hated. A world destroyer would have to have major political ramifications. Only really the worst races, or those in utter desperation would resort to it. Which is why it would be AWESOME!
End of kalimor's quote
Yes it would.

Reply #15 Top

Quoting kalimor, reply 11

I would like a world laser. Something that would essentially take up the entirety of the ship, would have to be built around for looks that would annihilate worlds. It could be a massive research project that would take its own hull, you could then enact your own design for it.
End of kalimor's quote

That's highly unlikely to be implemented, because Frogboy will probably veto it:

We just don't alow orbital bombardment for the sake of genocide runs. GalCiv will NEVER EVER have that. ... The most we'll do would be Terror Stars and even those I don't want to have for the same reason (cheesey genocide runs).
End of quote

Granted, that quote was in regards to GalCiv 2, but I very much doubt, that Frogboy changed his mind.

Reply #16 Top

Quoting Gaunathor, reply 15


Quoting kalimor, reply 11
I would like a world laser. Something that would essentially take up the entirety of the ship, would have to be built around for looks that would annihilate worlds. It could be a massive research project that would take its own hull, you could then enact your own design for it.

That's highly unlikely to be implemented, because Frogboy will probably veto it:


We just don't alow orbital bombardment for the sake of genocide runs. GalCiv will NEVER EVER have that. ... The most we'll do would be Terror Stars and even those I don't want to have for the same reason (cheesey genocide runs).

Granted, that quote was in regards to GalCiv 2, but I very much doubt, that Frogboy changed his mind.
End of Gaunathor's quote
True.

Reply #17 Top

Much like others that have posted here I agree with some of their suggestions:

More cockpit/bridge components.

Weapons that can have a recoil action as well as a rotating one,even if its a tick box in the shipyard template page.

As for the world laser,we have Terror stars -why blow up a planet when you can blow up a entire solar system! ;)

I would like more jewellry that can be used as engines like the Star trek warp nacelles.

And unlike GC 2 where 6 unique racial ship styles were spread over 12 races perhaps we can have individual race ship styles?

As for a munching jaw have you tried rotating the parts?

just some thoughts....

Reply #18 Top

I think I'd like a moonstone cannon..

Reply #19 Top

Quoting Echelion, reply 17

Much like others that have posted here I agree with some of their suggestions:

More cockpit/bridge components.

Weapons that can have a recoil action as well as a rotating one,even if its a tick box in the shipyard template page.

As for the world laser,we have Terror stars -why blow up a planet when you can blow up a entire solar system!

I would like more jewellry that can be used as engines like the Star trek warp nacelles.

And unlike GC 2 where 6 unique racial ship styles were spread over 12 races perhaps we can have individual race ship styles?

As for a munching jaw have you tried rotating the parts?

just some thoughts....
End of Echelion's quote
I would like 12 or more race styles,and more jewelry.

Reply #20 Top

Ok while we can't get a world death laser, can we at least get a damn Yamato Canon. I NEED my ships to look like this

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-TWwZbbRsrnA/UTnfGnxyKRI/AAAAAAAAuzs/I-yKppJPbNk/s1600/10185348b10.jpg

Reply #21 Top

Haha, yes! Yamato cannon great idea. If i cannot get the world cannon at least a really big gun would be nice

Reply #22 Top

Quoting kalimor, reply 21

Haha, yes! Yamato cannon great idea. If i cannot get the world cannon at least a really big gun would be nice
End of kalimor's quote
Two words.BATTLE-SHIP!

Reply #23 Top

Quoting Ericridge, reply 18

I think I'd like a moonstone cannon..
End of Ericridge's quote

:thumbsup:

Reply #24 Top

Maybe a fighter to make a carrier.

Reply #25 Top

Quoting SF1, reply 24

Maybe a fighter to make a carrier.
End of SF1's quote

Carriers have already been confirmed.