Thank you!

Here's a link if anyone wants to see the announcement.

Oh, and I guess we need some screenshots here.

Thank you!

Partly. Bizzarely to get it to look like there is no shields, we have to double our ship mesh sizes.

SoGE does basically the same thing, but has a shield effect. To save RAM, we'd use a sphere around the ship more like Sins shields are.

Actually its more due to the game engine. Its only a 32 bit system so you can only use 2 GB of RAM. LAA helps a little but RAM usage is still an issue with mods.

It does but other bottlenecks exist as well. Single core usage. No multi threading. Sins was not really designed with long-term operation in mind but rather as a way for Ironclad to break into the gaming business. It's gone long past that and sadly it's poor internal design holds it back. Hopefully Ironclad gets back to its roots and puts out a Sins 2 with better internal design like 64 bit and multi core processing.

This a a game that, in its most basic vanilla form is nearly a decade old now, and yet, it still has a sizeable player base that I would consider most impressive for a ageing strategy game. Its setting can also allow it to directly tap into the similar (perhaps even larger) Homeworld player base. It also has the attraction among PC games of being pretty unique, arguably to the point of being a genre in and of itself. It has plenty of potential buyers.

I have no doubt that only rebuilding the engine for modern 64bit systems is a mammoth task on its own, but with the amount of interest still left in the game, and the lack of direct competitors, I would imagine it would be a very sound investment to make, as far as I can tell.

I'm not entirely sure the community even particularly wants developmentally time-consuming things like new ships, new game modes, or a different play-style from a possible future Sins release. Even a graphical update is largely undesired, it seems to me. The one thing people invariably mention are the technical issues such as the lack of multi-core support, 2GB RAM limit, etc.

Ironclad have outdone themselves with the long term support they have provided in the form of patches and so on, but I think it is incredibly foolish of them and their publishers to let such a game languish on an ancient engine, that is wholly unfit for realising the full potential scope of the game. 

One can only hope that they took notice of the succulent gravy train that the Homeworld Remastered Collection provided for Gearbox (despite GBX releasing it in a sorry state), and make an engine remaster of their own game.

tl;dr for ironclad devs: Make a SoaSE engine remaster, and we will all throw money at you.

It would be nice, but almost certainly won't happen for Rebellion. Maybe Sins 2.

Unofficially it sounds like they are taking the route of making Sins 2, rather than reworking the game with a better engine. Which is what they always said they would do anyways.

Actually it is one of the standard events from the Stellar Phenomenon DLC. Just an incredibly rare one. E4X does add some new random events like property bubbles or a rogue pirate captain, but Interregnum itself doesn't have any right now. When it does they will definitely be Star Wars themed.

The Moddell Sector map is the only one that has a little (or not so little) Easter egg for those that have kept up with the lore.

You might see more such things, though not exactly what you're saying. Something more Star Warsy... and dangerous!

The CEO of Stardock posted in a random thread on the Rebellion Steam forums that a sequel was in the works, but it would be some time yet. There's been no official announcement yet but I'd say that's trust worthy. Makes sense I suppose, they probably just started when Ironclad abandoned Sins of a Dark Age.

In many cases this actually impossible to do. It is not uncommon for me to delete files in new versions, and since my mods do not come with an installer, it would no doubt cause plenty of issues when people don't read the instructions to manually delete files. So I'm afraid I'm not able to do that. Since each version is clearly labeled (in a different folder), I would keep any old versions you download around so that you can go back to them as needed.

If you check this thread out and don't mind making a moddb account, you might get access to such a list. 

The reason two of the upgrades do not autocast is because they cost resources, and in general it is a very bad idea to give the AI autocasting abilities that consume resources (plus as you mentioned the annoyance for the players). Granted in this case they'd only apply to cap ships that don't have the upgrade yet, but still. The reason one upgrade is one autocast is because that one is free for the AI.

Now that you mention it there might be a way to make it more accessible to the AI, but it wouldn't be a high priority.

Popping back in to say Hi @Goa. The Rebel Alliance seems to be just right with 3.1. I see that you quietly updated the list of upcoming New Republic ships at some point. That was a nice little surprise for me and I still eagerly await it. I recognize that it will take as long as it takes, so I am swallowing the temptation to fall into some of the more annoying commentary that an excited mod consumer can lapse into. Thank you for the ongoing work and support from you and your team.

You noticed that quickly. It might not even be the final list (I.e., there might be more). 

All commentary is welcome. Annoying commentary just may not be replied to if its really bad. 

Thank you for the kind words. 

I've decided to wait until the 1.83 patch is up and running for everyone. Because I don't want to update things every month or every few weeks when it is obvious the 1.83 patch out right now isn't going to be the final version.

I don't think anyone understands much about why the AI does anything (slight exaggeration, but sadly true). 

But I'll try it out. Technically the Victory is more complicated since it is also a Siege capitalship, but it can't hurt I guess.

Also check out the first revealed New Republic Cruiser, the Majestic.

Perhaps the best mid-sized weapon platform produced by any side in the Galactic Civil War, the Majestic was an extremely potent ship armed with a powerful trifecta of Turbolasers, Ion Cannons, and Warhead Launches. The New Republic designed the 700m ship as the most offensively oriented in a series of powerful cruiser sized vessels, capable of obliterating small Imperial frigates and cruisers on its own and providing impressive fire support for capitalships in fleet actions.

The Majestic also boasted some of the most advanced auxiliary systems on any New Republic warship. These include an anti-missile system and the most accurate fire control system in the galaxy, allowing it to rip apart enemies at long range with little risk or at least enable the Majestic to get the first strike on an enemy. However, all these powerful systems and weapons left the Majestic with relatively little power for its engines and shields. As such, wise New Republic commanders should try to make sure these ships are always accompanied by more durable units, who can take the bulk of enemy fire while the Majestic cleans up the mess.

While I'm on the topic of entity classifications, did you intend on the neutral trade station in E4X being classed as a starbase?

Seems a bit weird to me...

Yes. Sins likes to dump if you spawn certain civic structures like trade ports in an uncolonizeable gravity well. I had a very different solution before, but it turned out that it subtly but severely screwed up the AI. So I scrapped that and went with the Starbase approach.

You should still be able to build your own starbases in such uncolonizeable planets however.