nukes

It's irrelevant which would cause more civilian/environmental damage because:

1. There's no stupid environmentalists in Sins. Everyone knows that they were all killed in the PETA wars (J/K).

2. Each weapon system is destructive in its own right, and really doesn't need to be analyzed like this.

3. It's a game mechanic, for a game. That's it. Deal with it, or play something else.

I concur Zombies.

Sorry, was just feeling a little humorous since he already asked this question.

Ya, I shouldn't have hit "Post Reply" (usually don't in these cases). It's my fault if anything as I started the negative banter even if it was intended as harmless fun at the time.

 My apologies if I've angered anyone.

Game play wise it doesnt matter but looking at it from a factional point of view the TEC nukes. Next would be the vasari and lastly the advent.

Tec outright use brute force, cant get any more than that with nukes.

Vasari have advance precise weapons. They can target whatever with accuracy.

Advent suck only because they want a change in people opinions (and revenge) why kill population unless you have too...