Again, I don't think you understand - I was talking about taking copyrighted material from sold content, and releasing it via mods.  You don't exactly understand what "taken directly from" means, do you? 

I have a feeling that stopping modders from adding civs (again - not copy/pasted directly from copyrighted material) would be a bit extreme...what, are they really going to say "Sorry, your civ is named Babylon and is aggressive and expansionist and starts the game with a settler, just like ours - DENIED!" 

I think it would be more along of the lines of "Sorry, you copy/pasted all the code we had for Babylon, used our all art work as is, and didn't change a thing - DENIED!"  

Do you understand now?  It's really annoying when someone ignores what your position is, and when you point it out to them they sidestep it with a "There's no need to directly copy and post it at all" - when that's what is being talked about!  Especially when they add a "you clealy don't know how mods work do you?"   

Well...you clearly don't know what "copy/pasted directly from" means, do you?        

2K already destroyed the magic of BioShock with their multicrap feature . Now they will destroy the magic of Civilization with the DLCs.

The only way the Gamers Bill of Rights matters is if consumers demand them.  The only way they'll hear demands is via sales.

I expect the same consideration in return.  Why I don't want steam to have to run in the background for store-bought dvd-installed single-player games played offline (SBDISPGPO) is not something I need to justify.  When I became an adult they took the bone out of my head that made me feel the need to justify myself.

Second, I'll answer anyways -- a main reason is that steam collects information.  Their privacy policy is too long to quote here (see [url]http://www.valvesoftware.com/privacy.html[/url]) but here's a part:

"By using Valve's online sites and products, users agree that Valve may collect aggregate information, individual information, and personally identifiable information, as defined below. Valve may share aggregate information and individual information with other parties. Valve shall not share personally identifiable information with other parties, except as described in the policy below." (emphasis mine)

I have steam installed but haven't run it in months.  Last night I fired it up to see what games I have on it, and updating hung at 99%.  I restarted a few times then waited 20 minutes the last time and finally gave up.  Good thing I wasn't needing it to play a game I bought, especially one where steam wasn't necessary (as with a SBDISPGPO).  So that's another reason.

Third -- what's wrong with objecting to yet another program running?  In itself one isn't a big deal, but even after minimizing running programs and services I've still got 40 running now on win7.  I have ~24 on my winXP machines.  That adds up, and they can interact.  Blithely accepting an unnecessary third-party programming running in the background is not prudent.  If anything here is crazy, that's what's crazy.

Fourth -- I wouldn't mind a one-time internet activation, if it was for a DD game.  Having to do it for a store-bought dvd-installed game isn't benefiting me, it's benefiting steam so they can collect info off me, that they profit from (and I don't, heck, it's at my expense as I don't want my info shared with who-knows-who).  They're using this to collect information.  Requiring steam to run in the background even for SBDISPGPO is just a way to keep collecting/updating information (see reply 351 in this thread).

Fifth -- I don't mind decent DRM (no rootkits, etc), as a craftsperson is worth their due.  Civ4s DRM was fine, and I don't think the steam requirement will prove any harder to crack than Civ4s was.  If so, then this change won't be a significant improvement DRM-wise.

I've made it clear I don't mind a one-time online activation for DD games (from steam or whoever).

I've made it clear I don't want to be forced to run an unnecessary third-party program in the background with a SBDISPGPO.

Does Impulse require that?

Steam for Vegetables

Please note that you must connect to the Steam Network and test each of the games you would like to use in Offline Mode at least once to set up your account and configure Offline Mode on your machine.

Never ever ever will I buy a game with this requirement.

Steam can kiss my 

Avoid Steam Games Scam Sites

PCWorld Staff

Mar 2, 2009 2:02 pm

Steam, a digital distribution platform for PC games, does away with the need to keep old installation cd's around. I've used it for a few games myself. But as Christopher Boyd at the SpywareGuide blog points out, if someone lifts your username and password, it's the equivalent of someone walking off with all your game cd's.

Boyd describes a couple of scams that attempt to do just that. The first scam uses a site that looks much like the regular steam site, and uses the lure of a free gift pack of games to draw you into entering your username and password. A classic phishing scam, with some pretty good-sounding bait on the hook.

The second, related scam uses another classic phishing tactic, and this time attempts to scare visitors into believing their account must be verified or be permanently disabled. According to Boyd, the scams are being hyped on YouTube (and also getting a heartening batch of scathing responses).

Games have been a popular target for digital thieves for some time. There's real value, as thieves can make quick money by selling stolen online currency from some games, or stolen accounts chock-full of downloadable games. And it's low risk, because you don't have the same kind of security in place to protect games as for a credit card account, for instance. So if you're a gamer, it's a good idea to be just as careful with your game account logins as your banking credentials. They're just as much of a target.

No, I totally understand your point.  Yea, if someone actually lifts copyrighted material then they should get the smackdown.

My point is not that.  My point is mods that replicate the "function" of a DLC but don't actually copy anything.  There are tons and tons of these right now for Civ 3 and Civ 4.  ZehDon makes the point perhaps better then I did.  MW2 did this very thing.  "Oh, so sorry, you can't make custom maps anymore for the game because we're going to sell mappacks now."  Very same thing can (and probably will if history teaches us anything) ban mods that they feel are either too close to their overpriced DLC's or might be something they will do in a DLC in the future.  "Sorry Rhye, we're pulling your overhaul mod because it makes changes to the tech tree that we might offer ourselves someday.  Too bad, so sad".

History already tells us this happens with games that allow Steam/Valve to control modding.  And since the whole point of Civ's longevity is modding it's a very valid concern.

Either way it doesn't matter, I'm not buying the game period because I will not be forced to have Steam running to play a single player game.  I don't care if it's not online or not.  Heck, I even bought Dawn of Discovery with it's Tages DRM.  DRM for the most part doesn't scare me if it's just something like one time online activation.  I've got no problem with that.  But DRM isn't my issue with Steam.  It's forcing Steam down my throat for a single player game for "features" that the vast majority of the Civ community could care less about and with the danger of really hurting the mod community.

We can still hot-rod today, but the backyard mechanic part is pretty hard.

Some of us computer owners are computer-hotrodders.  Allowing unnecessary programs that slow things down (we can argue how much steam does and if it's enough to be a problem, but not that it does), and that may/probably interact with the myriad of other necessary programs, is undesirable.

There's also the privacy thing.  Letting steam or impulse connect once in a while to grab a game or update is one thing, having one of them running just to play a SBDISPGPO crosses the line for me.

Acti I do boycott outright, they're pretty much 1 of the 2 publishers I boycott (Sega is the other, though that will end when the new Virtua Fighter is announced for console)

I don't think anyone is calling for a boycott of anything, except Civ 5 here.  In my case, I don't want to buy for a mix of DRM and Steam issues. 

I'm not calling for a boycott of Steam.  I'll use Steam for cheap games.  I just don't trust Steam with anything expensive the way I would Impulse or GG.

Ours are Siberians, one's a wolly (long fur) the other is a standard.  Your dog sounds like an angel!  Our male (the wolly) is about 7 and doesn't pretend to be an alpha male, he gave that up and lets our female be the boss...as long as he gets his food, a cool place to sleep, and a belly rub every once in a while he's fine.  He's very mellow.

Our female is a terror!  She's almost 4, she escapes, barks at people walking their dog, wants to play 24/7, thinks everything is hers and she has a right to get inside (trash, the cats food, our food, etc).  When she's inside and we're occupied watching a movie, she tends to do things like - waiting till we're distracted, then walking quietly into the kitchen and jumping up to look at the counters to see if we left anything out.  I got on to her plans only after I noticed her trying to sneak upstairs with the whole bag of bread...she's too smart for her own good. 

They bark, but they mainly sing and howl.  They do the wolfs howl quite a bit together. 

Here's what she started as: 

And 3.5 years later (along with our wolly, plus a stray we're trying to find a home for):

Hahaha! 

I think the Pitmix said he's not gonna get Civ5...

Well, if they're going to be hosting an "official mod hub" and distributing mods through it, that's pretty reasonable. Companies get sued for distributing copyright infringing material, and offering your customers downloads that will trash their computer is generally bad for business (unless you're Mcafee).

Since you can download mods the old fashioned way still as well, there's no problem. I actually like the idea of having some assurance that a mod was checked for malicious activity. (Mind you I'd like it even more if they used a format that prevented mods from doing bad things in the first place, but they didn't and we're stuck with C++ mods now.)