For sure Zombie, anyone can hijack a thread, it takes REAL skill to LOCK one.
@Swiss-Science is not hard to believe at all:
"The record of reckless speculation of human origins is so astonishing that it is legitimate to ask whether much science is yet to be found in the fieldatall."
-Sally Zuckerman, evolutionist.
"It is absolutely unreasonable to reject the notion of a Creator by appealing to science. Science has definitely shown the non-contradiction of Creation out of nothing."
-Dr. Henry Margenau, Professor of Physics and Natural Philosophy, Yale University
"It seems to me that when confronted with the marvels of life and the Universe, one must ask why and not just how. The only possible answers are religious. I find a need for God in the Universe and in my own life."
-Phillip Schaff, eminent historian, Professor at Yale university.
"We've got to have some ancestors. We'll pick those. Why? Because we know they have to be there, and these are the best candidates. That's by and large the way it has worked. I am not exaggerating."
-Dr. Gareth Nelson, American Museum of Natural History.
"Evolution is a theory universally accepted not because it has been observed to occur or can be proved by logically coherent evidence to be true, but because the only alternative-special creation is clearly incredible."
-Professor D.M.S Watson, famous evolutionist.
@Tobi: please restrain from insults and thus ignorance.
in what way can we observe macro evolution in nature? please give sources and proof.
the only proof i can give for God that would be considered "real" is that no natural event (big bang) could create the universe because that would require pre-existing laws of physics in order to be possible. God would not require laws of physics because he would dwell in a dimension or realm independent of time or physics.
