SINCE DAY 1 IVE NEVER HP STACKED, I GET ALOT ALOT ALOT OF KILLS (WHEN I PLAYED THE GAME) BUT BARELY DIE, HP STACKING IS FOR LADIES!!!!

I agree with Ryan. Unless you are going against a well cordinated team with heals and shields, there comes a point in the game where you hit a certain damage threshold and you can totally own hp stackers. Even if they have heals and shields you can trick your opponents into protecting the wrong person and still own them.

Hp stacking gives you an early game advantage but if you fail to capitalize on it you will get owned.

This is a good mechanical idea for an item. I`m not sure if there is a need for the facility to counter any particular strategy of Demigod play as discussed here, but nonetheless this is a good idea.

yes, thats what bugs me most about the game. i really would like to play another combo than unbreakable, flemish, crown, hauberk and unbreakable and early on these cheaper items, but they are just too good and give too much of a boost for all the things you need. so if i get +weapon damage i would salvage another item thats just better! so perhaps its not the hp-stacking thats too useful, its the damage and attack speed stacking that is far too expensive.

so  from me dalzk. its a good idea though it must be balanced well. 1% propably istn enough later on since you get >30hp/s.

You know what the easiest way to address HP stacking would be? Replace the HP flag on Cataract with something else.

Hp stacking is no different from anyother strategy, I hate people who spam rooks towers but I'm not trying to get ian item just to battle towers. That's why we og qot , wait I've forgotten the point I was trying to make...

either one im happy with.

HP stacking is too strong because the HP equipment itself is much more useful per cost than attack equipment.  Best solution would be to boost attack stacking through equipment, or nerf HP stacking in the same way.