I have been playing with Kerry and all is fine until I reach Lincoln who gave me a good beating. I then start with George W. Bush and noticed something very unusal and I think someone mentioned this before. My George W. Bush was way ahead in the Zoby Poll in the top 4-5 national issues. Literally, I have 80-90% of the people favor my position, yet I was completely behind in the election (according to the map color). This has happened both when I ran against Al Gore and ran against Bill Clinton. What the heck is that? Literally, Bush has 90% support on War on Terroism with 30+% people considering as the most important issue and I was losing bad. In fact, I have look at state by state as well. For instinct, I have made California care for War on Terrosim as the most important issue and I have an edge of 130+ verus 40 points , and Jobs was the second most important issue to Californians and Bush versus Clintonwas 50+ to 10+ points. I forgot the third most important issue, but I wasn't behind. Yet, California was leaning toward Clinton. What the heck? You may think it is all due to awareness, right? No. Clinton and Bush both has 100% Awareness. What is going on?
Most interesting, the night before the election concluded (last turn -- 41st week), the Zoby Poll predicts Clinton will beat me by a landslide: 370+ to 150+ point. Yet, when the vote actually counted I won narrowerly, like Bush has 290 electoral points. Can the Zoby Poll be that off? That is kind of funny. Nonetheless, my problem has more then just the poll. With the kind of lead Bush has over Clinton on all major issue, he should have had a landslide. So there is something wrong. Can someone confirm this?
