I am interested in how this game compares to President Forever 2004...I played the demo of President Forever...it was fun in my opinion. I know you have to take into account that PF was made to be an election simulator and PM was made to be more fun. However, overall, which is best?
The exclusion of National Debates, Washington D.C. , 100% custom-made canddidates playable online (and on top of that, a lack of pre-made candidates such as Howard Dean and McCain), the slowness of the Ubisoft QA Team on getting the demo out...has all given me doubts about this game. And the fact that Stardock has not really promised to continue developing some of these basic left-out game features, concerns me the most. The big thing that draws me to this game is its multi-player capabilities, otherwise I would have already chosen President Forever 2004. However...is it lacking so much that the MP does not make up for the "problems"?
Thank you in advance for any opinions.
P.S.
A few more forums should be added in my opinion for more organization (so everything does not have to be mixed up in Game Support):
Suggestions/Ideas
General PM Discussion
